It seems a lot of projects and distributions are seeing new releases either now or in the very near future. This week, we had a very quiet minor release of GJDoc, the GNU Classpath equivalent to javadoc. 0.7.9 includes a few changes that were previously only available in CVS, but the main one is a small fix that allows Classpath 0.97.1 documentation to be built. Our minor .1 release for 0.97 fixed a bug where the JSR166 code was not being included in the documentation build. With this fixed, it turns out gjdoc would no longer build the documentation as java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit is a rather complicated enumeration that our hacks can’t bypass. Michael Koch, in packaging GJDoc for Debian, was kind enough to point out that having the current release of GJDoc not being able to build documentation for the current release of Classpath was a bad thing. A quick release fixed this by pushing out the fix I made for this issue back in March. Of course, you can now use javadoc for IcedTea/OpenJDK to build the documentation instead; with another Free JDK about, there’s no need to just rely on GJDoc.

I do wonder what the long term future for GJDoc should be. It only works with GNU Classpath at present through a nasty bunch of hacks which cause the parser to skip chunks of the input. It really needs a major cleanup and to be made to work properly with 1.5 code. Thomas Fitzsimmons suggested we should merge it into the GNU Classpath codebase which seems a good idea, as it means we don’t run into this same revision hole we just did. However, it is worth maintaining GJDoc at all? For me, the main features it has over the OpenJDK javadoc are in speed and the look of the output. A key feature is also that it it plays nicer with Free Software i.e. it includes an option to include the source code with syntax highlighting. You can see the output for Classpath 0.97 online.

JikesRVM is also stepping up for a new release, 2.9.3, and this will be the first to showcase the new Classpath support for a non-copying unsynchronised StringBuilder. This is designed for local method usage where the builder will be converted to an immutable String object rather than leaving the method. As a result, I’ve been rushing to get it in a releasable state, as I know there’s a nasty bug lurking in the older patches JikesRVM has been using recently. I managed to do this today after we fixed a build issue. It seems the javah in OpenJDK6 outputs differently named header files to those JikesRVM implicitly depends on. We fixed this by making this dependency explicit as it should be, but perhaps this also uncovered an OpenJDK6 bug. I’m not sure where we should be filing these yet, so I just posted to jdk6-dev.

It’s also nice to hear that Ubuntu has just shipped with IcedTea6 included. Fedora 9 will also ship early next month (May 13th) with similar support and an OpenSUSE build is in the works. It’s nice to see Java support making it into the mainstream, thanks to Sun’s recent moves to make their JDK Free Software. On the less positive side, it seems that Gentoo won’t see support for IcedTea6 anytime soon. The Java Gentoo developers seem to be on a strange mission to support only the proprietary Java solutions (pretty much an inverse of what Fedora, Ubuntu and Debian do). In porting my IcedTea6 ebuild from the Libre Java overlay to their own overlays, they seem to have decided to drop support for GCJ… I’m not even going to go into how dumb this action is, as I could be here a while. Suffice to say, I don’t see how IcedTea6 can be bootstrapped without GCJ, let alone how they expect to then build it on architectures like PPC, PPC64 and ARM, as we’ve seen happen on the OpenJDK distro mailing list. It seems a very odd move for a distribution supposedly built on compiling things from source…